Welcome toWord.Tips.Net
Ask a Word Question
Make a Comment
Beauty Tips
Car Tips
Cleaning Tips
College Tips
Cooking Tips
Excel2007 Tips
ExcelTips
Family Tips
Gardening Tips
Health Tips
Home Tips
Money Tips
Organizing Tips
Pest Tips
Pet Tips
Wedding Tips
Word2007 Tips
WordTips
Standardizing Note Reference Placement
Selecting Printing of Color Pictures
Moving Rows and Columns With the Mouse
Patrick has a table in which the top cells of two adjacent columns are merged. If he positions the insertion point within a cell of the first of the adjacent columns (but not in the merged cells), and then selects Table | Insert | Columns to the Right, Word dutifully adds a column, but also adds a blank cell at the right of the merged cells.
This behavior is normal for Word. Let's say that your table consists of three columns, which we'll call A, B, and C. If you merge the first row's cells in columns A and B, you now have two cells (one large and one small) in the first row and three cells in each of the other rows. Position the insertion point into a column A cell that is not the first, merged row and choose Table | Insert | Columns to the Right. Word adds a new column B and pushes the other columns (old B and old C) to the right. This means that Word has to add a cell to the right of the merged cells (in new column C), else the first row would be incorrect. What you end up with after the insertion is a first row with three cells (one large and two small) and the other rows with four cells--just as you should.
The supposed problem comes in when your table has all the cells in the first row merged. For instance, you may have a table that has two columns and two cells in the first row are merged into a single cell. When you insert a column to the right of the first column, Word also adds a cell to the right of the first, merged cell. What you might expect, however, is that Word would insert the column without affecting the merged cell, such that the single merged cell would now span three columns instead of the old two.
There is no way to do this when doing a simple column insert. There are a couple of things you can try, however. One method is to split the merged cells in the top row, insert the desired column, and then merge the three cells into one (Table | Merge Cells).
You could also go ahead and insert the columns as already described. Then select the old merged cell and the new added cell in the first row and merge them again.
Another method is to separate the merged row from the rest of the table by using Table | Split Table. You can then insert the columns as desired and recombine the previously split tables. Of course, you will then need to expand the width of your merged cell so that it fully covers the three columns below it.
Finally, you can insert cells instead of inserting columns. Assuming that your two-column table has ten rows, follow these steps:
Word shifts the selected cells to the right and inserts blank cells. The top row remains unchanged, with the merged cells still spanning the first and second columns. If you want the merged cells to span all three columns, you'll need to drag the cell border so it is the desired width.
Tip #350 applies to Microsoft Word versions: 97 2000 2002 2003
More Power! For some people, the prospect of creating Word macros can be scary. WordTips: The Macros can help you conquer your fears and you'll discover you're much more confident and productive as you make Word do exactly what you want. This is an invaluable source for learning macros. You are introduced to the topic in bite-sized chunks, pulled from past issues of WordTips. Learn at your own pace, exactly the way you want.